Conscience and Conscientious Objection in Health Care
An ARC Discovery Project, running from 2015 to 2017
Summary of project
Conscientious objection is a central topic in bioethics and is becoming more ever important. This is hardly surprising if we consider the liberal trend in developments of policies about abortion and other bioethical issues worldwide. In recent decades the right to abortion has been granted by many countries, and increasingly many conservative and/or religious doctors are being asked to perform an activity that clashes with their deepest moral and/or religious values.
Debates about conscientious objection are set to become more intense given the increase in medical options which are becoming available or may well be available soon (e.g. embryonic stem cell therapies, genetic selection, human bio-enhancement, sex modification), and given the increasingly multicultural and multi-faith character of Australian society. Not only will doctors conscientiously object to abortion, and to practices commonly acknowledged as morally controversial, but some of them may also object to a wide range of new and even established practices that conflict with their personal values for example, Muslim doctors refusing to examine patients of the opposite sex.
Defining conscientious objection and identifying reliable markers for it, as well as setting the boundaries of legitimate conscientious objection through clear and justifiable principles, are difficult but pressing tasks.
This project advances bioethical debate by producing a philosophically and psychologically informed analysis of conscience, and by applying this to discussions about the legitimate limits to conscientious objection in health care.
Chief Investigator Dr Steve Clarke, Charles Sturt University
Investigator Prof. Jeanette Kennett,
Partner Investigator Prof. Julian Savulescu, University of Oxford
Julian Savulescu's work on conscientious objection cited in a July 2016 United Kingdom All-Party Parliamentary Group report on "Freedom of Conscience in Abortion Provision”
Conference “Conscience and Conscientious Objection in Health Care”. Oxford, 23-24 November 2015, organized by Steve Clarke, Alberto Giubilini and Julian Savulescu.
Project relevant publications
- The proceedings of the conference will be published in a
special issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, coedited
by Alberto Giubilini and Julian Savulescu
- Alberto Giubilini, Conscientious objection and medical tribunals, Journal of Medical Ethics, online first 9 June 2015
Julian Savulescu’s Conscientious Objection Talks and Media Visits
30 August 2016. Public Lecture: Conscientious Objection and Value Pluralism in Medicine. QUT, Brisbane.
More information: https://www.qut.edu.au/law/about/news-events/news?news-id=107337
29 August 2016. Should Doctors Have the Right to Conscientiously Object? Health Report. ABC Radio National and podcast on ABC Online.
Bioethicist calls for a ban on doctors' conscientious objection appeared in over 100 print media sources throughout Australia.
Doctors working in the public system should be banned from refusing to perform certain procedures, such as abortions, because of their religious
...Savulescu will make the argument at a public lecture at the Queensland University of Technology's Australian Centre for Health Law Research next...
29 August 2016. Consensus Statement on Conscientious Objection . Practical Ethics in the News.